![]() |
| 'Just a trim please...' |
Total disaster. If I'd of forgotten earrings, tights, lipstick, shoes even...well I could have coped. I would have been peeved... but I would have coped.
But having no wig was devastating and I ended up changing back again, packing everything up and having a semi-miserable night in a semi-miserable sulk. As all cross-dressers know, it's when the wig goes on that the show really starts. But why is this? And how has hair become such a potent visual signal? Desmond Morris takes a closer look at the subject of women and their hair in chapter two of 'The Naked Woman', specifically from the point of view of a zoologist.
If women let their hair grow as nature intended it would either be down to their knees or frame their face with a huge woolly bush which, Morris suggests, would have provided a remarkable sight when our prehistoric ancestors were on the move. [edit: Since I published this the 'Dangerous Minds' website has published an article of Victorian women who never cut their hair. Imagine this lot naked and trekking across the plains of the Serengeti! Long Victorian hair ] Primates do have a variety of ways of using their hair with a range of colours, tufts and crests but the human females ability to grow an almost cape-like fringe over their body seems at first more of an encumbrance than a help. Odd enough in itself but even odder is the fact that the human female is pretty much hairless every where else (apart from armpits and groin), which is another sign of neotany or the tendency to retain juvenile features. According to Morris the stunted form of female body hair is about the same as on a 26 week old chimpanzee foetus! So why should we have this long top hair on our head and downy foetal body hair almost everywhere else?
Well, the best guess seems to be that it acts as a 'species flag', with hair providing a strong visual image. This allowed our ancestors to identify their own kind from a distance and then, when closer, the hairy-faced males could also be distinguishable from smooth females. The different types of hair (allied to skin colour) then developed to allow quick identification of different habitat-specific types. Morris suggests that the spread of humanity out of Africa into different habitats triggered evolutionary adaptations but that these adaptations only started in a few specific areas - hair, numbers of sweat glands, skin pigmentation - before the consequences of our intelligence made them irrelevant. Now, as we are pretty much removed from the effects of specific environments and move about and mingle throughout the world these differences will eventually disappear.
| Good, strong roots are essential for women's hair |
One other thing that Morris points out is the fact that the vast majority of hair dyes purchased tend to look at lightening the hair, emulating the blonde look and creating a situation where there are more artificial blondes in the world than there are real ones. Why is this?
One fact comes down to the fineness of the hair itself. Blond hair is softer, smoother and more sensual than other coarser hairs, especially on the body, armpits and pubic area so it could be that this is an attractive trait that dying seeks to emulate. Of course it doesn't actually make the hair finer, but the association in the eye of the male is there...
Secondly, and we are back to the neotany thing again, being blond is a far more juvenile characteristic than having dark hair and it sends out unconscious 'take care of me signals' to interested males! Most children have lighter hair than their adults so the blonde female is again tapping into this rich vein of empathy with her 'baby blonde locks'.
| Well, it's OK if you really like the look I suppose... |
So that's it with hair. Everyone it seems wants blonde hair because it's softer, finer, sexually tactile and you only get light fuzz on your body as well as making you look more child-like. Could be why gentlemen prefer blondes I supppose...
Personally the next time I'm thinking about a new wig I think I'd love a redhead style but then that's probably just as well, all things considered.




